Grokipedia

On the 27th of this month, Elon Musk released Grokipedia, a new online encyclopedia to rival Wikipedia. This is a service by XAI, an AI company which Elon Musk owns. Wikipedia is written and edited by people, and as those of you who use the site know, Wikipedia has a significant left-wing bias. Larry Sanger, one of the founders of Wikipedia, has also sharply criticized this bias, claiming that it abandoned its basic principle of neutrality and is biased toward a far-left ideology. The Manhattan Institute’s 2023 report also noted that articles about right-leaning public figures often contain more negative language than articles about left-leaning public figures.

And the internet is comparing Wikipedia and Grokipedia on the same topic.  One example is George Floyd,

On the 27th of this month, Elon Musk released Grokipedia, a new online encyclopedia to rival Wikipedia. This is a service by XAI, an AI company which Elon Musk owns. Wikipedia is written and edited by people, and as those of you who use the site know, Wikipedia has a significant left-wing bias. Larry Sanger, one of the founders of Wikipedia, has also sharply criticized this bias, claiming that it abandoned its basic principle of neutrality and is biased toward a far-left ideology. The Manhattan Institute’s 2023 report also noted that articles about right-leaning public figures often contain more negative language than articles about left-leaning public figures.

And the internet is comparing Wikipedia and Grokipedia on the same topic.  One example is George Floyd,

Note the difference between Wikipedia's first paragraph on George Floyd compared to the first paragraph from Grokipedia. The nuance and detail on Grokipedia is FAR superior to Wikipedia and is clearly not pushing any ideologies, unlike Wikipedia. Corrections like this are… pic.twitter.com/NoTnLq2pxe

— Dillon Loomis (@DillonLoomis) October 28, 2025

Another example compares Robert Kennedy Jr.

Wikipedia vs. Grokipedia

Wikipedia smears RFK Jr as a “conspiracy theorist and anti-vaccine activist” in the first sentence, while Grokipedia sticks to the facts.

I’m switching to Grokipedia 👍 pic.twitter.com/OvumKlvjQW

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) October 27, 2025

When I looked into the origin of Covid-19, I found that Grokipedia is neutral in its explanation, saying “Experts’ opinions are divided, but there is also the theory of the Wuhan Institute outbreak,” while Wikipedia says “The laboratory outbreak theory is baseless, and conspiracy theories about the origin of the virus have spread widely.”

So I encourage you to check out the both sites to see which site stands in the middle. 😉